by Carolee Sherwood
I love the saying, “Smoke ‘em if you’ve got ‘em.” It’s more colloquial than carpe diem, and it’s a cowboy version of laisser-faire.
It’s also a very colorful, concise way to say, “Do what you want when the mood strikes you,” and “If you have something at your disposal you can use, go right ahead.”
As poets, we can appreciate the need and the urge to make hay while the sun shines (to borrow another colloquialism). In other words, when an idea comes, write it down quick! Capture it! Don’t let it get away!
The real answer to the current Read Write Poll — “Where do you write most of your poems?” — is “anywhere and everywhere I can.” The real answer isn’t at the computer, in my journal, on notepads, on scrap paper, on post-it notes, on napkins, receipts and other mismatched items, on the back of my hand or in book margins. It’s “all of the above.”
But since we’re instigators here at Read Write Poem, we made you choose only one, and at press time, almost half of us write most frequently on our computers.
With so many of us being bloggers, I suppose that’s no big surprise, so let’s use the comment section to set ourselves free from the constraints of staking claim a single favorite writing tool. Tell us all the places you write.
Tell us what lengths you’ve gone to in the past to remember an idea until you could write it down. How long did it take? Did you have to ask someone for a pen or a Kleenex? Do you get up in the middle of the night and struggle with the notepad on the nightstand? Do you grab envelopes off the passenger’s seat and write while you drive?
As poets, we are both cunning and practical. I can’t wait to hear how the two conspire to compel you to write at the most inconvenient places and times!
Here’s how the poll dance works: We post a poll and let it ride for a week and a half, and then I’ll talk a little bit about the topic and the results. The poll will stand for a few days after that to allow additional participation. The rotation gives each poll two weeks in the white-hot spotlight.
<img style=”vertical-align:bottom;border:0px;margin:0 0 0 5px;padding:0 0 0 0″ src=”http://readwritepoem.org/files/2009/07/splat-ender1.jpg” alt=”" width=”20″ height=”20″ />by Carolee Sherwood
by Carolee Sherwood
I have two poems-in-progress right now. One is about aliens, visitors from other galaxies. The other has something to do with Hemingway. Neither aliens nor Hemingway is on the list of choices for the current poll. Apparently there are other things to write about, as you’ve all pointed out in your generous responses. (I’m always so happy when a Read Write Poem interactive component is showcased!)
The top five topics capturing the imaginations of our Read Write Poets are memories, feelings, the self, nature and spirituality.
There’s no way to know if our interests mirror the workings of the larger poetry community. A database of existing poems and their subjects would be both ridiculous and impossible. I did hear somewhere that all poems are about love (if you know who said it, jump in and add it to the comments). Love was definitely a popular answer in our own poll.
Even though the poll allowed us three votes, I only selected one: myself. I decided that all of my poems are about myself. Even when the subject matter seems like it’s completely unrelated to me, as in the case of the aliens or Hemingway, I think my poems show how I see the world. They highlight things I think about. They carry things that are of interest to me or important to me. Me. Me. Me. Myself. They are all fragments of myself.
I think that answer disqualifies me as a “real” poet. I don’t think “I always write about myself” is the “right” answer. For me the “right” answer probably has more to do with human suffering. Poets who still call themselves “confessional” may be at risk of being left behind.
And speaking of left behind, no one is writing about animals. No one? I feel bad about that. Aren’t the animals deserving of our verse? Maybe it’s time for a Read Write Prompt about animals. Anyone?
So take a moment and join me on stage (otherwise known as the comments section) for a swing around the poll! What did you report as the top three subjects for your poetry? Do you write about most things on the poll’s list or do you focus on just the few you selected? Are topics what your poems are really about or is there a deeper, underlying theme? And maybe for fun this time, if you want, leave us a link (only one or you’ll get caught in the spam filter) to a poem of yours that you would identify as most “typical” of your repertoire.
Here’s how the poll dance works: We post a poll and let it ride for a week and a half, and then I’ll talk a little bit about the topic and the results. The poll will stand for a few days after that to allow additional participation. The rotation gives each poll two weeks in the white-hot spotlight.
by Carolee Sherwood
How do you know when a poem is finished? (And by “finished” I don’t mean “doomed”; I mean “completed.”) It’s a question every poet struggles with, and the possible answers are endless: A finished poem is one somewhere between “just started” and “beaten to death.” A finished poem is one that survives the trash bin. A finished poem is one that has done its job (from the poet’s point of view). A finished poem is one that has done its job (from the reader’s point of view).
Some believe the finished poem is a myth. They claim it does not exist. I tend to agree, and I like what French poet Paul Valery said on the matter: “A poem is never finished, only abandoned.” In my case, revision can be an unhealthy obsession; the desire for perfection is an ominous enemy. I am guilty of editing the essence right out of some pretty decent beginnings.
Others (some of them are good friends of mine) believe a poem is always finished, that it expresses itself fully in each moment. They hesitate to revise too much or at all.
As I am reminded again and again both in therapy and in life (isn’t it interesting when those two things tell the same story?), the truth is somewhere in the middle, in the gray area between the inspiration and the carving, between the sanding and the last coat of varnish. In the introduction of The Collected Poems: Sylvia Plath, Ted Hughes writes, “[Sylvia's] attitude to her verse was artisan-like: if she couldn’t get a table out of the material, she was quite happy to get a chair, or even a toy. The end product for her was not so much a successful poem, as something that had temporarily exhausted her ingenuity.”
Most Read Write Poem-ers have declared 30-199 poems “finished,” whatever that means for them, and there is representation at both ends of the spectrum: those not being able to finish a poem and those finishing 1,000 or more.
Let’s talk about our definitions of “finished” and our processes for arriving at the finished poem. (I found a really terrific check list for revising your poems at a website of a private middle school in Washington State; you can also review January’s article on revision, just in case you missed it the first time around.) Let’s also talk numbers. For every “finished” poem you reported, how many are floating around your actual or virtual workspace “unfinished?” How many poems must a poet have before he/she’s prolific? Can a poet write too many poems? Is there a magic number of poems a poet should have before he/she considers assembling a manuscript?
Here’s how the poll dance works: We post a poll and let it ride for a week and a half, and then I’ll talk a little bit about the topic and the results. The poll will stand for a few days after that to allow additional participation. The rotation gives each poll two weeks in the white-hot spotlight.
by Carolee Sherwood
by Carolee Sherwood
The word “befuddle” has two distinct, seemingly unrelated meanings. The dictionary at answers.com says this: “1. To confuse; perplex. 2. To stupefy with or as if with alcoholic drink.” While we’re most familiar with the first definition, the second — “to stupefy … as if with alcoholic drink” — gives me spectacular images to relate to the current Read Write Poll about trying to respond to a poem we don’t understand.
Think stammer. Think stutter. Stumble. Bumble. Imagine mouths agape. Picture bleary eyes, comical gestures, sweaty brows. The critic in me insists that I also mention obtuse poetry may cause loss of consciousness or vomiting. I apologize on her behalf for taking the metaphor too far. I am amused by her nonetheless.
I am instantly transported back in time to ninth grade English class (not by the drinking, silly, but by the stuttering). We go up and down the rows of desks taking turns reading verses in Romeo and Juliet. If any of us understands the lines on first read, you can’t tell by how our tongues trip over themselves, how we lack appropriate emotion and emphasis, how we utterly fail Master Shakespeare, one of the most talented and prolific writers we encounter in our formal educations. It’s ironic how “free” we all felt when our teacher releases us from our confusion and tells us, line by line, what, exactly, Shakespeare means.
A couple years later, I discovered a different kind of freedom associated with poetry. In 1989 (how could it have been nearly 20 years ago?) Peter Weir directed Dead Poets Society, starring Robin Williams as the rebellious Professor Keating. Keating, who asked his students to call him “Oh, Captain, My Captain,” not only encouraged free thinking about literature but incited an entire classroom to rip out the introduction of their poetry texts. The pages they destroyed contained an essay, “Understanding Poetry,” by Dr. J. Evans Pritchard (a fictional academic) which gave the readers of poetry a mathematical formula for rating verse.
Even as adults, no matter how learned, how well-read or how educated we are in artistic and poetic devices, we all have moments when we feel completely lost looking at a painting or reading a poem. It’s like another language, right? Yes! And with good reason: it is another language (although it’s embedded in our own).
It can be nerve-wracking to have absolutely no clue. We often assume there’s something wrong with us or with the poet or with the poem. If we don’t “get it,” something has to be wrong. We believe that sometimes. It’s practically a rule written on our subconscious by our expectations and the expectations of the many others.
Since rules are made to be broken (I’m with Keating on this), poets themselves are among those who try not to be so serious about the Herculean effort to come to a poem’s meaning. One of the most well-known examples is Billy Collins’ “Introduction to Poetry.” It concludes, “… all they want to do / is tie the poem to a chair with rope / and torture a confession out of it. // They begin beating it with a hose / to find out what it really means.”
And of course (of course!), books have been written about it. They include How to Read a Poem by Burton Raffel, Poetry for Dummies (it was only a matter of time) and How to read a poem: And fall in love with poetry by Edward Hirsch. The internet is also full of well-meaning individuals with advice on reading poetry. They include the Poetry Foundation’s How to Eat a Poem, Erin’s How to talk about a poem, Winthrop University’s How to read a poem, and two articles here and here by teacher Tina Blue.
Some of these resources have ideas that resonate with me, but many of them seem to have the same dictatorial spirit as the fictional Dr. Pritchard; I get nervous just reading them. I don’t want poetry reading to be a job. I want it to be an experience.
And I want to hear about your experiences. So far, the poll results show two clear front-runners. When asked to respond to a poem we’ve read but don’t understand, the overwhelming majority of us either “Come clean and say, ‘I have no idea what this means,’” or “Latch onto an image/phrase we like and talk about that.” I know there are stories in those answers, so for this poll dance, comments are wide open.
Tell a story about a time you misinterpreted something. (Was it funny? humiliating? maddening? How did you handle it? Was the poet in the room?) Share a resource that has inspired you to read poetry with fresh eyes. Offer suggestions from your personal experiences about approaching a poem that initially baffles you. How has your personal poetry reading style evolved? Are you still afraid sometimes?
Here’s how the poll dance works: We post a poll and let it ride for a week and a half, and then I’ll talk a little bit about the topic and the results. The poll will stand for a few days after that to allow additional participation. The rotation gives each poll two weeks in the white-hot spotlight.
|
read write poem news- read write poem napowrimo anthology
June 20, 2010 | 1:36 pmThe Read Write Poem NaPoWriMo Anthology is still in production. Selection, placement, layout and copyediting are taking longer than anticipated. Thank you for your patience. I hope to have the piece completed in July. For those who have emailed asking if they can be included, the May 7 deadline for submission of work stands. Those who met that deadline will be included. Please check the post on this site listing who I received submissions from by that date. If you submitted your work by the May 7 deadline in accordance with our guidelines and your name is not listed, send an email to info (at) readwritepoem (dot) org.
- read write poem napowrimo anthology
May 5, 2010 | 3:09 pmRemember that Friday* is the deadline for submitting work to the Read Write Poem NaPoWriMo Anthology. Check out the guidelines for submission in the main column (to the left). On May 8, we’ll post a news item listing everyone we’ve received work from. If you submitted work and your name is not on that list, please let us know. Thanks!
*I initially said “tomorrow,” but I meant to say “Friday.”
- napowrimo congratulations, and a reminder
April 24, 2010 | 12:05 pmIt’s the final week of the Read Write Poem NaPoWriMo Challenge! Just 7 days left. With that, a reminder that Read Write Poem will culminate with the anthology featuring work from those who complete the challenge. A post with details for submitting to the anthology will be published May 1. Be sure you remove any information from the site that you want preserved — such as group content and personal messages. Those elements of the site will be removed May 1 as well. The main site will remain up as an archive.
- ‘underlife’ tour at january gill o’neil’s blog
April 20, 2010 | 8:11 pmJanuary Gill O’Neil’s virtual book tour has moved to her site and is underway now. Check out the lineup at Poet Mom.
Archive for read write poem news »
|
thank you and farewell As of May 1, 2010, Read Write Poem is no longer active.
In late May, an anthology featuring work from those who completed the Read Write Poem NaPoWriMo Challenge will be published here and on issuu.com.
|