by Read Write Poem
What do you see in this week’s Read Write (Image) Prompt?
Does the progression of time seem frozen, or does it march on? What is the significance of the prone figure in the foreground? Is he/she merely resting as they journey forward, or is their journey over? Is the person in the distance approaching, walking or running away, or observing the scene from afar?
When you look at the image, what does it spark in your mind about the passage of time? What does it mean to you emotionally? Experientially? Physically?
Leave any initial thoughts that you might have about this prompt in the comments section of this post, then leave links to your work next Thursday in the comments section of the Get Your Poem On post.
(Note: If you include this photo in your post along with your poem, make sure you credit the artist.)
by Carolee Sherwood
Hello, Thursday, it’s me, Carolee. I brought a few friends. They brought a few poems! (You brought poems, right?)
Whether your wrote about what you believe or what you don’t believe — and even if you wrote about whatever the heck you wanted to write about! — post your links or your poems in the comments section of this post. Once you’ve done that, skip around and visit your fellow poets.
Be sure to come back tomorrow for another prompt. 
Please read this page to find out how the Get Your Poem On and Read Write Prompt posts work.
Remember that work linked from this post is shared in precisely that spirit: sharing, as opposed to critiquing.
If you haven’t done so already, please read all the pages under About in the navigation bar.
If you participate in a Read Write Prompt, we ask that you link back here in your posts, either with a link to Read Write Poem or by using the Read Write Poem badge in your post. Sidebar links are great but it helps others find the site when you link in every post you contribute to the project. It’s not a lot to ask in acknowledgment of the work everyone is doing in providing prompts for members to use.
Carolee Sherwood is a poet and artist who lives in Upstate New York. She is co-editor of Ouroboros Review, mother of three boys and a veteran Read Write Poem columnist. You can find her rambling about the creative life at Carolee Sherwood and drafting poems at I Am Maureen.
by Deb Scott
 Anatomy for the Artist, by Molly Gaudry
“I take on too much, and I tend to sometimes get behind schedule, but the truth is that without all these things I’d rot, mentally.”
Welcome to the March Read Write Poem Virtual Book Tour. If you are new to this series, take a look at this post for more information.
About “Anatomy for the Artist”
Molly Gaudry is a graduate of the University of Cincinnati’s M.A. fiction program. She is the author of We Take Me Apart, a novella in verse, (Mud Luscious 2009) and is the book reviewer for East&West Magazine, based out of Hanoi, Vietnam. Her writing has most recently appeared in Lamination Colony, and she has stories forthcoming in Robot Melon, Quick Fiction, Wigleaf, Dogzplot, and Word Riot. She co-edits Twelve Stories, solo-edits Willows Wept Review and contributes to the Big Other blog. You can find out more about Gaudry at her blog.
You may want to read an interview with Gaudry at jmww: “We Take Molly Apart (and carefully put her back the way we found her).” She talks about blogging, her writing life, working on journal(s), Cincinnati, all kinds of stuff. (You do want to read it. No maybes about it.)
We are pleased to feature “Anatomy for the Artist” in our March Read Write Poem Virtual Book Tour and invite you to follow along — the collection is available online through the publisher’s site, Blossom Bones.
Tour stops for “Anatomy for the Artist”
Mar. 2 :: Donna Vorreyer :: Put Words Together. Make Meaning.
Mar. 4 :: Catherine Fitchett :: Poetry Chook
Mar. 9 :: Lawrence Gladeview :: Righteous Rightings
Mar. 11 :: Ren Powell :: Babel Fruit
Mar. 16 :: Wanda McCollar :: Wanda McCollar
Get involved!
Would you like to get involved in the tour as a reviewer? Just join the Read Write Poem Virtual Book Tour group, and then add your name to the forum thread titled “Sign up to be a Virtual Book Tour reviewer.”
Want to get your book on the tour? We’ve already set up partnerships with a number of presses, and we’re booked out several months. We also do the tour only once a month, which means we’re extremely limited in terms of what we can include. With that in mind, feel free to have your publisher send a query to virtualbooktour (at) readwritepoem (dot) org.
Deb Scott is a community director for Read Write Poem. She also co-manages this Virtual Book Tour and plays around with words and occasionally other stuff. Deb blogs at Stoney Moss.
by David Moolten
The ambition of this month’s Workshop Redux is to explore the world of line breaks. Why should you, as a poet, use line breaks? Well, the simplest reason is that at some point you run out of paper. In the old days, this meant hitting the chrome bar and making the typewriter carriage return so you could keep writing on the next line and not on the bare typewriter roller, which wouldn’t record your efforts.
Today, line breaks occur automatically and arbitrarily at the right margin of each virtual page according to the setting established in your word processing software. This is how line breaks work in prose, and for the most part no one writes or reads anything into them.
Poets generally choose to break their lines sooner (except in prose poems, where the poet forsakes the poetry of line breaks in favor of other verse elements). Unfortunately, these breaks can sometimes be or at least appear no less arbitrary, especially in so called free verse, earning the derision of poets who write more formally. Ideally, “free verse” poets engineer their line breaks to provide some enhancement to a poem’s rhythm, a slight visual, oral and/or aural pause. This pause tends to heighten the contrast between ending word (and idea) in the first line and the starting word (subsequent idea) in the next line, emphasizing both words and often creating surprise, sometimes through a pun on the last word of the first line. The effect is often more dramatic when a sentence doesn’t end at the end of the line (end stop) but continues onto the next line (enjambment).
In formal poetry there is a set number of beats and/or syllables per line, this number being discretionary, though generally regular and having some connection to the length of the human breath and the attention span of the human ear. The line break comes at the end of this determined length, although formal poets will also try to exploit an end of line pause for the same reasons as “free verse” poets.
This month’s poem was written by James Wright, a poet from the American Midwest who enjoyed an illustrious start in the formal camp and then became an apostate, switching allegiances quite famously in his third book, This Branch Will Not Break. The poem’s title is “A Blessing.” I suspect many of you will have read it before, its fame in no small part having to do with its line breaks. Nevertheless, I’ll first provide you with a version of the poem in which I’ve rescinded the breaks, and further down I’ll give you the opportunity to read the original text.
A Blessing
Just off the highway to Rochester, Minnesota, twilight bounds softly forth on the grass. And the eyes of those two Indian ponies darken with kindness. They have come gladly out of the willows to welcome my friend and me. We step over the barbed wire into the pasture where they have been grazing all day, alone. They ripple tensely, they can hardly contain their happiness that we have come. They bow shyly as wet swans. They love each other. There is no loneliness like theirs. At home once more, they begin munching the young tufts of spring in the darkness. I would like to hold the slenderer one in my arms, for she has walked over to me and nuzzled my left hand. She is black and white, her mane falls wild on her forehead, and the light breeze moves me to caress her long ear that is delicate as the skin over a girl’s wrist. Suddenly I realize that if I stepped out of my body I would break into blossom.
Interestingly, Wright wrote many prose poems, some quite remarkable. This, however, was not one of them. Should it have been? And if not, did he do “Wright” by it with the line breaks he chose (sorry … )? As an exercise, you can if you wish provide your own line breaks and see how they compare with his. The poem with the author’s line breaks appears below.
A Blessing
Just off the highway to Rochester, Minnesota,
Twilight bounds softly forth on the grass.
And the eyes of those two Indian ponies
Darken with kindness.
They have come gladly out of the willows
To welcome my friend and me.
We step over the barbed wire into the pasture
Where they have been grazing all day, alone.
They ripple tensely, they can hardly contain their happiness
That we have come.
They bow shyly as wet swans. They love each other.
There is no loneliness like theirs.
At home once more,
They begin munching the young tufts of spring in the darkness.
I would like to hold the slenderer one in my arms,
For she has walked over to me
And nuzzled my left hand.
She is black and white,
Her mane falls wild on her forehead,
And the light breeze moves me to caress her long ear
That is delicate as the skin over a girl’s wrist.
Suddenly I realize
That if I stepped out of my body I would break
Into blossom.
So let’s look at the line breaks. Ending the first line at “Minnesota” brings us suddenly away from the earmarked and well-mapped path of the unremarkable highway (and Wright’s prior path as a “formal poet”), into the wild fields where there is twilight, darkness yes, but also luminosity, mystery and risk, though of a supple living kind. This twilight bounds though without threat. Ending the line here emphasizes the idea of breaking free and surprises us with the wild twilit grass.
The second line is end-stopped, a complete thought, no reason to go on and possibly burden the line’s delicate breath. Beginning the third line with “And” implies continuation where there is none, creating a kind of in medias res effect — we’re looking at two ponies (and they at us) we didn’t know were there: more surprise, and reassurance. That they are “Indian” ponies has a certain noble outcast resonance, which the enjambment enhances by emphasizing the light effect via “Darkening,” reminding us of the twilight, the risk-taking, and now giving us confrontation, only to take it away via the oxymoronic “with kindness.”
The eyes darken by dilating, because of excitement, here joy, not violent intent. Again an end-stop, the thought over, and the line break so as not to burden the exquisite sound and thought of the line with any more language. The next line ends so as to emphasize “willows” and “welcome,” which heightens the emotion of the scene.
The “to” and other small words like it generally come at the beginning of new lines, rather than the end of old ones, though not always. Syntactical and ubiquitous, they tend to be undramatic and even clumsy at the end of lines, not so much at the beginning, where they are ignored, heightening the effect of subsequent words. Sometimes other prosodic considerations win out and ending a line with “from” or “and” is still artistically desirable.
The next line end-stops and breaks so as to remain small and nimble, in keeping with the poem’s mood and scene. The seventh line reminds us of the separation between highway and living field and emphasizes that word “pasture,” with its suggestion of peaceful rumination, as well as its earthy groundedness. The eighth end-stops on “alone,” underscoring the ponies’ isolation, auguring the loneliness the poem later addresses. The end-stop also lets the dynamic and perfectly descriptive ninth line hit us harder. Ending on “happiness” highlights the innocence and emotion of the moment, and the surprising fact that the human “we” is the source. Again a quick delicate end-stop, allowing the animated and metaphoric power of the eleventh line, “They bow shyly as wet swans. They love each other” to hit us whole. End-stopped as well, this allows the marvelously surprising: “There is no loneliness like theirs.”
The ponies are perfect companions to each other; but something is missing, and the affection they show the interloper(s) proves it. The inclusion of line breaks tells us something in a way that prose could not. Again, the delicate thought and musical phrase are complete (why crush it with more language?) thus the end-stop, and another short line. With its quick pulse, suggestion of sudden accommodation (how ponies behave) and of a return to task, “At home once more,” quickly breaks, making us wait to find out what the task is, and setting up the variation of the long line to follow. The task is eating, the lowering of heads implicit, and the flaccid extent and scrunched syllables of the line suggest the luxuriant action. The end-stop allows the radical observation of the next line to wallop us, “I would like to hold the slenderer one in my arms,” the enjambment keeping the tension and letting us savor the image before continuing.
The next two lines. “For she has walked over to me / and nuzzled my left hand” return to the delicate phrasing and music compatible with the action. The following two lines are more descriptive — the poet face to face with his subject — and are carved out as quick and complete units. Then Wright radically returns to the tactile he only contemplated earlier, “And the light breeze moves me to caress her long ear” the palpable materials of the environment taking him over. He ends the line at “ear” because the unit of the line in terms of music and meaning is complete and because he wants to surprise us with the amazing comparison he makes in the next. A girl’s wrist? Wow. Now the poem is also about his own quest for wholeness and intimacy, and we know, we absolutely know he discovered it just as we did.
There’s no reason to go on of course, so the line finishes with an end-stop, and the next line tensely advises us of the epiphany, of the search for and the excitement in discovery, “Suddenly I realize.” Keeping this short heightens the suspense of course: Just what did he realize? What follows in the enjambment is again amazing. “That if I stepped out of my body I would break” offers total surprise for the reader who is also stepping out of expectation, out of the confines of “the body” as it refers to the academy, to poets and poetry as confined by tradition. To step out of one’s body is nothing short of total transcendence and liberation. It’s also incredibly risky. So the enjambment turning on the word “break” focuses everything on this liminal moment of self-annihilation. What follows renders this one of the more notable line breaks in modern American poetry: “into blossom.”
So we are changed. The break doesn’t destroy anything; it’s pure rapture, pure innocent maturity and fecundity. Here is a man no longer galloping from a three-point stance into another man to smash his body in football or war. Here is a man no longer taciturn and muscle-bound from the searing factory floor, who can only push a woman around in drunken frustration, or herd animals towards the slaughterhouse. Here is a man and a poet no longer in the prison of expectation. But for the line breaks, we might not have known.
Reprinted from This Branch Will Not Break (Wesleyan University Press, 1963) with permission of the publisher.
David Moolten’s latest book, Primitive Mood, won the 2009 T.S. Eliot Prize from Truman State University Press. His work has been widely anthologized, and his honors include a Pennsylvania Council on the Arts Fellowship and a Pushcart Prize. David is also a physician specializing in transfusion medicine. He writes at Edible Detritus.
by Dana Guthrie Martin
I had the pleasure of meeting Anita Boyle and Jim Bertolino last year when they were reading individually and collaboratively written work as part of a poetry series in the Seattle area. I was taken by the writing that Anita and Jim have been doing together over the years and asked if I could talk with them about their collaborative work. They graciously granted me an interview. I hope you enjoy their thoughts about collaboration.
Dana Guthrie Martin: You all say that you started writing together because you were hanging out in bars and it’s hard to hear one another but very easy to write collaboratively by passing a piece of paper back and forth and writing line by line. What gave you all the idea to try this form of collaboration in the first place?
Anita Boyle: Writing poetry collaboratively started as a form of conversation. When you don’t know someone very well, and you’re really trying to talk to them, but you can’t hear a darn tootin’ thing they’re saying, and you happen to be a writer, you pull out your journal. A rational response. You write something in it, and pass it to the person you’re attempting to talk to. Maybe this is something we learned in elementary school when kids first start passing those forbidden notes back and forth. If you’re in a noisy bar, and you happen to be a writer AND a poet, when pen goes to paper there’s not much of a transition from conversation to poetry. So the idea was spontaneous.
Jim and I began writing collaborative poetry shortly after we met, since when we were dating, we often ended up in noisy places: bars, taverns, pubs. We went other places, too, and sometimes wrote collaboratively there: at a coffee shop, or in a park, or beside the Noon Road pond. These were usually quiet places, so once we began to write in the noise, it easy to write in the quiet. And we’ve kept it up because it’s fun to write this way.
Jim Bertolino: While it’s true that Anita and I began writing collaboratively as a way to communicate effectively in noisy bars, for me there were other aspects of the process that kept me interested, generated satisfaction. I am a poet who loves responding to what appears to happen randomly, and when your collaborative partner shares a passage, it can be like an unexpected gift handed to you by a smiling stranger. It calls for your best creative efforts to either create a verbal landscape that might be implied by what you’ve received, or willfully alter the direction of the burgeoning poem to shape a surprise or insist on contrast. Like the curse of tragic nostrils! Participating in a collaborative poem is an acceptable opportunity to release your rational mind from the responsibility of making something meaningful. A chance to get down and roll in language like a white mare in mud.
DGM: Jim, you say that collaboration allows you to willfully alter the direction of the burgeoning poem. Has that ever been a problem for you and Anita when you work together? Have you ever pulled each other too far, so far the poem lost its sense of where to go and how to recover from all the tugging?
JB: Part of the great fun of poetry collaboration is in trying to compose a passage that is imaginative or clever enough to seduce your partner into embracing a new direction. This is an especially useful strategy when you think the territory that the poem has moved into over several exchanges has been explored enough, or when some part of what your collaborator has just written switches the light on in another room, or in another part of town, or even in some other universe. And as for the poem losing its sense of where to go, one of the characteristics of lively collaboration is that you, or your partner, can always tug the poem back to its best direction.
DGM: And, Jim, you also talk about collaboration providing a means to “release your rational mind from the responsibility of making something meaningful.” How can that responsibility hamper a poet’s individual writing, and why is this freedom from responsibility so important?
JB: The reservoir of language and imagery every poet carries is fabulous, and while that source is always there to enrich and embolden what will embody meaning for the reader or listener, diving into that reservoir without a plan can not only be a pleasure, but may take us on currents of language and image to places we would have never visited otherwise. Both in my collaborative writing and in my intentional poems I have come to depend on eruptions that offer unexpected beauty: in deep connections created by the juxtaposition of certain words and phrases, and in images that can simultaneously seem both random and precise. I’m committed to sharing the experience of what I didn’t know was there.
DGM: Anita, so my question for you is: Shouldn’t there be a dating service that pairs people and sees if they are compatible based on their ability to write poetry together? Don’t you think poets would come to a workshop like that if you and Jim taught it? You could call it something like, “Write Together, Love Together.” Too cheesy? How about “Eat, Date, Poem”?
AB: From what I understand about dating services, Yes! Writing poetry together is a good way to interact even with an unfamiliar date, and can introduce a person to another in a unique way. Passing a journal between two poets offers each specific details about the other: handwriting style, type of humor, even political and social perspectives. Most poets have a few words they can’t stay away from (their personal lexicon). Mixing those words up with another’s adds a dimension to conversation that isn’t explored nearly enough. Especially now, with the huge number of communication methods available, it seems to me that collaborative communication will continue to become a norm in the arts, in the workplace and in simple conversation. There’s a lot of give and take in collaborating, and that’s not such a bad thing. For now, collaborative poetry is an opportunity for a extraordinary personal experience in a semi-intimate environment.
Titles are hard to come up with. As far as a title for a workshop like this? Your titles are fine, but how about: “Poetry as Duet” or “How Do You Do? My Name is Not Sue: The Poetry Date Experience”?
DGM: Anita, you also talk about the transition from conversation to poetry being a small one. Doesn’t this fly in the face of those who proselytize about how arduous and lonely poetry work is and by definition has to be? What a drudgery it is? How different poetry is (and should be) from “normal” conversation?
AB: I believe that writing poetry can be arduous and lonely, which often guides the inspiration for a poem and creates a tension in it that makes for great work. But if a poet thinks writing is a drudgery, they should perhaps call themselves a hobbyist and find a new one. Gardening, for example. Life is too short for unnecessary drudgeries, isn’t it?
Writing your own poetry is a similar to writing collaboratively, but is an entirely other experience. Collaborative poetry usually starts out quick and fast by comparison. Two people can write two to five poems in a matter of hours, which doesn’t happen for most poets on their own. (Revising collaborative poems seems to take about the same amount of time as revising one’s own poems. I believe in a revisionary god. That’s where the thing gets the spark.)
With your own poetry, it’s an inner struggle to find the right musical cadence, to construct a rhythm, find the perfect near rhyme, etc. You can tear your hair out for just one word, that one particular, yet elusive word. But in writing together, it’s a poem by committee. Committees are what they are. They can work as well as a rusty fat-tired bike, or as smooth as a professional quality road bike, but all committees depend on the input given from everyone. This is a relief, too, because some of the responsibility of coming up with something fantastic is alleviated, though committees sometimes add other elements of stress. When collaborating, while one poet is working on the poem at hand, the other can be thinking about where to take the poem next, or observing the one currently writing, or they can even be writing a grocery list. And if something from the grocery list makes it into the poem, so much the better.
There hasn’t been any pressure to be the greatest-poet-that-ever-lived when I write with Jim. Sometimes, I’ll finish my lines, set them down in front of him and say, “You can cross that out if you want. It’s terrible.” He never has. Well, maybe a word here or there, but that happens rarely. He makes things work. And when it’s my turn to add onto the poem again, sometime I think, “Oh brother. Where are we going with this?” But we keep going. At the end we read the poem out loud (very loudly sometimes, depending on where we are), and are almost always surprised by what came together. I can’t think of any that we actually ignore as poems or potential poems. When we go back through our journals, we type them up, revise, combine, shuffle, and make them work somehow. I find collaborating with Jim has been a relaxing, enjoyable, and sometimes a hilarious experience, and it’s shaped our relationship in very good ways.
If you like writing poetry, I don’t see any drudgery in that. Hard work, maybe. But it’s just a ton of fun, whether it’s collaborative or one’s own.
Dana Guthrie Martin is the founder of Read Write Poem. In 2010, she is taking a break from completing poems so she can study their component parts, while at the same time learning a new musical instrument, most likely the oboe.
|
read write poem news- read write poem napowrimo anthology
June 20, 2010 | 1:36 pmThe Read Write Poem NaPoWriMo Anthology is still in production. Selection, placement, layout and copyediting are taking longer than anticipated. Thank you for your patience. I hope to have the piece completed in July. For those who have emailed asking if they can be included, the May 7 deadline for submission of work stands. Those who met that deadline will be included. Please check the post on this site listing who I received submissions from by that date. If you submitted your work by the May 7 deadline in accordance with our guidelines and your name is not listed, send an email to info (at) readwritepoem (dot) org.
- read write poem napowrimo anthology
May 5, 2010 | 3:09 pmRemember that Friday* is the deadline for submitting work to the Read Write Poem NaPoWriMo Anthology. Check out the guidelines for submission in the main column (to the left). On May 8, we’ll post a news item listing everyone we’ve received work from. If you submitted work and your name is not on that list, please let us know. Thanks!
*I initially said “tomorrow,” but I meant to say “Friday.”
- napowrimo congratulations, and a reminder
April 24, 2010 | 12:05 pmIt’s the final week of the Read Write Poem NaPoWriMo Challenge! Just 7 days left. With that, a reminder that Read Write Poem will culminate with the anthology featuring work from those who complete the challenge. A post with details for submitting to the anthology will be published May 1. Be sure you remove any information from the site that you want preserved — such as group content and personal messages. Those elements of the site will be removed May 1 as well. The main site will remain up as an archive.
- ‘underlife’ tour at january gill o’neil’s blog
April 20, 2010 | 8:11 pmJanuary Gill O’Neil’s virtual book tour has moved to her site and is underway now. Check out the lineup at Poet Mom.
Archive for read write poem news »
|
thank you and farewell As of May 1, 2010, Read Write Poem is no longer active.
In late May, an anthology featuring work from those who completed the Read Write Poem NaPoWriMo Challenge will be published here and on issuu.com.
|