get your poem on #33: with a plot twist*

by Deb Scott and Dana Guthrie Martin

*and the one wherein Deb and Dana refer to themselves in third person

For this week’s Get Your Poem On, Deb and Dana are throwing a wrench into the works. We know y’all like to come here to the Get Your Poem On post and, well, get. your. poem. on. Which makes perfect sense. However, in your rush to get your poem on, you might not exactly be reading the content of said post. Are we right? We thought so.

This week we have important things to report. Very big RWP developments, ones we want you to hear. So we are stopping the presses, so to speak. We’ve decided to close comments on the Get Your Poem On post until 10 a.m. CST Monday. That’s right. No linkey poem love until we open the floodgates wide.

In the meantime, please sit tight, and while you are sitting tight, please read this post. Do it. (Please.)

So, last week we reported on starting the Read Write Poem Twitter page and invited people to have the username and password to that page in case they wanted to post there as part of the RWP community. We got exactly zero responses to that request. But are we dissuaded by the lack of response? Heck no. We’ve simply chosen to change up how we will use the page, and we’d like to explain a little more about it.

What we’ve decided to do is use the RWP Twitter page to tell folks about developments on the RWP website (that would be here) and on our new Read Write Poem Facebook group (that would be there). More on the Facebook page later. For now, let’s focus on the Twitter page.

In addition to using the RWP Twitter page to make official announcements about the project, we also want to use it to help you all connect with one another in new and wonderful ways.

Why Twitter when we can all simply blog? Because Twitter is like group instant messaging. Rather than hoping one of your poetry pals will stop by to weigh in on a question you just posted or read a brilliant poem you just put on your blog, you can post a short note (oh, and the 140-character limit on Twitter ensures your notes will be short!) on Twitter and your “tweet,” along with the tweets of everyone you are “following,” will appear on your own Twitter page. (Or a desktop application if you’d like, or even your cell phone. Now, we realize all this fancy talk might be too much for the older Twitterers — read: Deb – :-) )

Example: Dana “twittered” Deb into reading a great blog post of hers the other day, a post Deb might have missed if Dana had not twittered it.

Toward that end — communicating and poeming with each other — we would love for each and every one of you (but no pressure if you’re not into it) to sign up for your own Twitter account. (Just go over to Twitter and sign up. It’s easy peasy.)

The RWP Twitter page will “follow” all RWP participants who have Twitter accounts. That is, if you “follow” the RWP Twitter page. (We’ll only know you have your own Twitter page if you elect to follow us, then we’ll be notified that you’re following us and we can do the same for you.)

This will result in the RWP Twitter page having a big honkin’ list of RWP participants, so you all can go to our page and find other RWP Twitterers to follow.

This all sounds very complicated. But it’s not. Deb and Dana and Christine and several other RWPers are already twittering away. If they can do it, so can you. (And if this all seems very, very confusing, no worries: We are happy to take questions in the comments or through e-mail. Just ask.)

So do it. And then check back at noon Monday, when we will open comments on this post so you can Get Your Poem (and Twitter!) On.

Note: About the no-pressure part. We mean it. The RWP website will continue to bring you the same great content you’ve gotten used to. That won’t change. But if you are interested in growing our connectedness as a poetry community, all we are saying is give Twitter a chance.

informal talk about forms: the nuts and bolts of rhythm part 2

by Tom Adam

Following up on last month’s talk about the two “root” styles of verse, today we’ll explore metrical verse. Most formal poetry uses this as its basis.

Metrical verse
Most English verse uses an accentual-syllabic rhythm. While this could be four stresses in an eight-syllable line with no regard to the pattern, most accentual-syllabic verse uses meter: iambic pentameter, trochaic trimeter, etc. In a “best of both worlds” type of scenario, metrical verse gets to use the strong beats of the English language to give the poem an aural structure, and it gets an air of “refinement,” because it is clearly a crafted work, while purely accentual could just be prose broken (without taking the other elements into consideration) into lines by beats.

Formally, there are many types of meter, though only six have any real use. When talking about meter, there are two elements: what type of foot is used, and how many feet per line. How many per line is the second half of the description: it is (some) meter where some is a numerical prefix (penta=5, di=2, hep=7, etc.). The foot describes the repeated pattern of stressed and unstressed syllables. The six that cover the overwhelming majority of English verse are these (again, the bolded syllables are the stresses):

  • Iamb: generally considered the most common foot in the English language, and therefore in English poetry, the iamb is the repetition of unstressed followed by stressed syllables. If you want to get a feel for Iambic verse, check out Shakespeare, it’s just about all based on Iambic lines.
    “But soft, what light through yonder window break
  • Trochee: Easiest way to think of trochaic verses is that it is the opposite of Iambic-it has stressed syllables followed by unstressed. For most English speaker, this has a very strange feel, but (courtesy of Wikipedia) the lines from Poe’s “The Raven” are trochaic:
    Ah, distinctly I remember it was in the bleak December;
    And each separate dying ember wrought its ghost upon the floor.”
  • Finishing out the two-syllable patterns are spondees and pyrrhics, respectively two stressed and two unstressed syllables. Apparently, this line from Tennyson’s In Memoriam, is a good example of a pyrrhic foot, a spondee, a pyrrhic and a last spondee:
    “When the blood creeps and the nerves prick
  • Three syllable patterns are also common. The anapest is two unstressed syllables followed by one stressed syllable:
    “The Assyrian came down like a wolf on the fold
    -Byron, “The Destruction of Sennacherib”
  • Opposite the anapest is the dactyl: one stressed syllable followed by two unstressed syllables. A poetic form (of usually nonsense or children’s verse) is called the double-dactyl where all the lines dactylic dimeter. While not nonsense, the word ‘lexicographical’ is a double dactyl.

While there are technical terms for patterns longer than three syllables, they are pretty much not used (as patterns or terms), because they can usually be broken down into patterns of patterns. It is also important to note that most writers don’t stay strictly to meter; Shakespeare frequently added an unstressed syllable at the end of his iambic pentameter line to have a feminine ending, and switched trochees in every once in a while.

Meter, like accentual verse, can act like a metronome for the poem. By keeping the speed of the lines fairly consistent, it leaves a solid base for the poet to explore variations that stay connected because of the meter. On the other hand, the types of words used can force the speed of the meter to become faster or slower to affect pacing. Alexander Pope comments on this in his Essay on Criticism:

The Sound must seem an Eccho to the Sense.
Soft is the Strain when Zephyr gently blows,
And the smooth Stream in smoother Numbers flows;
But when loud Surges lash the sounding Shore,
The hoarse, rough Verse shou’d like the Torrent roar.
When Ajax strives, some Rocks’ vast Weight to throw,
The Line too labours, and the Words move slow;

The most important thing about working in meter, and the hardest, is to make it work for you, not to bend your work to the meter, or to form in general. The rhythm in your poem should seem natural and necessary to the reader, never forced or contrived.

read write prompt #33: wordplay is the new black

by Dana Guthrie Martin

I was over at Via Negativa recently, where Dave Bonta created an outstanding poem using the method given at ShuffleWords.

Basically, you take the words given to you, move them around on your screen and come up with a poem. It’s sort of like refrigerator magnet poetry but the word choices must be better, since Dave’s poem is so fantastic. Or maybe the word choices aren’t any better, and Dave just knows how to write a killer poem given any set of limitations.

This got me thinking: Why not have the Read Write Poem community use ShuffleWords to create their poems this week? And then I got to thinking a little more: Why not invite participants to engage in any kind of word-limiting exercise for their poems this week. Some examples might include cutting words out of magazines and limiting yourself to those words for your poem. You could even make a collage, scan it and post it on your blog for the next Get Your Poem On.

The above options don’t float your boat? What about picking out random words you see during your day, writing them down then using those words, and those words only, for a poem? Or, pluck words from a book for your poem. Or what about this: Use the random words that rattle around in your head all day. I’ll provide some examples from the track playing in my own head right now: noodle, rickety, spun, froth, boat, cannon, spire, train, feather, crow, brand, element, jargon.

There’s no limit to the number of word you can gather for your poem, just make sure you restrict yourself to only the words you collect using whatever means of collection you have chosen. So if you are pulling a bunch of words out of a book, and you suddenly realize you want the word “boa” in your poem but it’s not one of your words, well that’s just too bad, so sad.

Just kidding. We are somewhat loose with the rules around here, and nobody’s getting graded after all. So minor infringements are tolerated.

Oh, another collaborative way you can approach this project is to let someone else pick out your list, and then you run with that list to make your poem.

One caveat: Since we are restricting ourselves to only the words we collect, it would be wise to gather up a nice bundle. And don’t forget about things like “a,” “an,” “the” and “of” to name a few, otherwise you will find yourself sitting down to write and unable to make any of the oh-so-important connections and associations between words.

If anyone wants to jump into the comments section and throw out a big old list of words that other participants can use for their poems, that would be super excellent. (And in the collaborative spirit!) Just remember the a, an, the, of, in, on, -ly, -ed kinds of words in whatever list you leave.

So, to sum up. You can create your poem using:

  • ShuffleWords
  • Words clipped from magazines
  • Words taken from a book
  • Words you see out in the big wide world
  • Words that flit about in your head throughout the day
  • Someone else’s list of words, including those participants leave in the comments section
  • Whatever method you come up with that is to your liking
  • But wait! There’s more!
    In super exciting late-breaking Read Write Poem news: We just set up a Read Write Poem account on Twitter to which every single Read Write Poem participant will be given access (if they want access, that is). This is a grand experiment where (we hope) participants will chat, throw prompt ideas out there, ask poetry-related questions and collaborate with one another (such as leaving lists of words for other participants to use).

    The only glitch is you only get 140 characters over there per “tweet,” which is a considerable limitation. But there are ways around it. For example, you might want to pose a question on the RWP Twitter account and ask others to respond to it on their blogs.

    To access the account, e-mail us at info (at) readwritepoem (dot) org and we’ll hook you up. Just remember to play nice, which I am sure you all will. We don’t want any fights breaking out on the Twitterground.

    (Also, please note that of course you can interact with the RWP Twitter feed from your own Twitter account, but we thought it would be cooler to also give every participant access to the actual RWP account. This is a community, after all, and every single person in the community is part of the whole.)

    (Also also, if you have your own Twitter account — and if you don’t now is a good time to set one up — please do add Read Write Poem’s Twitter account to your list. We’ll be using our followers list to determine who we should be following over on Twitter.)

    get your poem on #32

    by Juliet Wilson

    From now until midnight one week from today, comments on this post will be open, so you can leave a permalink to your blog post for this week’s contribution.

    Be sure to check back through the week and see other people’s revised work, or any other idea that they’ve chosen to share for Read Write Poem!

    Please, link back here in your posts, either with a hyperlink to Read Write Poem or by using the badge in your post. Sidebar links are great but it helps our “internet health” when you link in every post you contribute to the project. And please add “Read Write Poem” in your tags, if you don’t mind.

    For the new folks: Please take a few moments to read the About pages, including our Copyrights page. If you have any questions about the project after reading through those pages, email us at info (at) readwritepoem (dot) org.

    get the lead out: it’s noting, really: quotable quotes

    by Christine Swint

    The soul should always stand ajar, ready to welcome the ecstatic experience.
    – Emily Dickenson

    Some people would raise their eyebrows and shake their heads to know that I mark up my books a lot as I read them. I guess it’s rude in a way, if you think about the next person who might pick up the book for a good read, but I can’t help it. I love to underline significant passages, even though I rarely review what I’ve underscored.

    To remedy my lack of review, I’ve taken to keeping a list of memorable quotations, thoughts that ignite a response in me that needs to come out on paper. If an author’s words inspire me enough to underline them, maybe those lines warrant special treatment.

    In his book The Art and Craft of Poetry, Michael J. Bugeja suggests using quotations as epigraphs, which he defines as “brief citations placed immediately above or below the title of your poem.” (Bugeja 11)

    In his chapter about occasion poems, such as poems responding to specific events in history, Bugeja states that a descriptive epigraph, “even if only a date,” can “ground the reader in time or convey information that will overshadow, forebode, or otherwise color the reader’s perception of events.” (Bugeja 127)

    A good example of the use of epigraph is Leilani Hall’s poem “Random Communication”. Hall begins with a dedication to her friend, Joyce Inman, and then follows with a quote in Spanish from Pablo Neruda’s poem, “Oda con un lamento.” Throughout the poem there are references to lines of poetry by Robert Creely, CD Wright, and reference material from the encyclopedia, all of which Hall cites in the notes section of her collection, Swimming the Witch. (If you missed Jessica’s review of Swimming the Witch, you can read it here.)

    The Internet is a great source of quotations. Here’s a list to get you started:

    The Quotations Page
    Bartelby
    Quoteland

    Quoteworld
    Brainyquote
    Quotegarden
    Cool Quotes

    I’ll leave you with one of the recent quotes I’ve copied into my notebook, taken from Creative Meditation and Visualization by David Fontana. In describing how ancient Greek sculptors viewed their work he says, for  him, ” … the stone was ready to disclose the divine image, provided he could become one with the stone and allow himself to become the instrument for this magical transformation.” (Fontana 17)

    Do you have a quote that has inspired you to write a poem? What are your thoughts about keeping track of quotes and referring to them as a source of inspiration? Have you ever written a poem that disagrees with another author’s thoughts? If you have a quote you’d like to share, write it in the comments section, and tell us your source.

    Bugeja , Michael J. (1994). The Art and Craft of Poetry. Cincinnati: Writer’s Digest Books.

    Fontana , David. (2007). Creative Meditation and Visualization. London: Watkins Publishing.

    read write poem news

    • read write poem napowrimo anthology
      June 20, 2010 | 1:36 pm

      The Read Write Poem NaPoWriMo Anthology is still in production. Selection, placement, layout and copyediting are taking longer than anticipated. Thank you for your patience. I hope to have the piece completed in July. For those who have emailed asking if they can be included, the May 7 deadline for submission of work stands. Those who met that deadline will be included. Please check the post on this site listing who I received submissions from by that date. If you submitted your work by the May 7 deadline in accordance with our guidelines and your name is not listed, send an email to info (at) readwritepoem (dot) org.

    • read write poem napowrimo anthology
      May 5, 2010 | 3:09 pm

      Remember that Friday* is the deadline for submitting work to the Read Write Poem NaPoWriMo Anthology. Check out the guidelines for submission in the main column (to the left). On May 8, we’ll post a news item listing everyone we’ve received work from. If you submitted work and your name is not on that list, please let us know. Thanks!

      *I initially said “tomorrow,” but I meant to say “Friday.”

    • napowrimo congratulations, and a reminder
      April 24, 2010 | 12:05 pm

      It’s the final week of the Read Write Poem NaPoWriMo Challenge! Just 7 days left. With that, a reminder that Read Write Poem will culminate with the anthology featuring work from those who complete the challenge. A post with details for submitting to the anthology will be published May 1. Be sure you remove any information from the site that you want preserved — such as group content and personal messages. Those elements of the site will be removed May 1 as well. The main site will remain up as an archive.

    • ‘underlife’ tour at january gill o’neil’s blog
      April 20, 2010 | 8:11 pm

      January Gill O’Neil’s virtual book tour has moved to her site and is underway now. Check out the lineup at Poet Mom.

    • RSSArchive for read write poem news »